Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:38

Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Are you afraid to get married and why?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
NASA KSC Announces COMET Staff RIF (Update) - NASA Watch
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Can a mother forget her child after she puts him or her up for adoption?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Why are the Chinese so sensitive to Western criticism?
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Risk Of Dengue Fever Is Just Another Reason Cruises Suck - Jalopnik
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What ESPN’s Football Power Index is projecting for Big 12 rivals BYU and Utah in 2025 - Deseret News